Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties
Show Less

Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties

Edited by Christian J. Tams, Antonios Tzanakopoulos and Andreas Zimmermann

Offering a unique conceptual approach to the Law of Treaties this insightful Research Handbook not only sets out the foundational issues, but identifies tensions within the field, including formalism vs flexibility, integrity vs flexibility, and uniformity vs specialisation, to name a few. It seeks to define and re-define the dimensions in which Treaty law operates, tracing its fault-lines and the challenges it faces, such as breaches, regime-collisions, state succession and armed conflict. Representing a broad range of jurisdictional and ideological perspectives, the Research Handbook provides a diverse and stimulating approach to international treaties.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Regime-collisions: Tensions between treaties (and how to solve them)

Jasper Finke


Resolving conflicts between treaties was once a rather straightforward topic of public international law. In the last two decades, however, as treaties became regimes and as conflicts or collisions turned into tensions, the topic has taken on a multidimensional character. The changes in terminology are therefore not merely an attempt to reclothe a well-studied topic. Instead, each term (treaties or regimes, conflicts and collisions, or tensions) reflects a different perspective that addresses a different set of problems. The main purpose of this chapter is to outline and categorize these problems as well as to sketch out possible solutions. Usually, the starting point for every analysis of regime or treaty collision is to define and clarify the term collision or conflict. This chapter will depart from this traditional approach, not because it is incorrect but because it would imply that there is only one true meaning of conflict in this context. Indeed ‘validity’ can be found in all of the current definitions of regime – or treaty collision in the sense that they point to different problems and perspectives, and are as such the result of specific developments in public international law. These different problems and perspectives are captured by the terms compliance, coherence, and constitutionalism that will serve as the analytical framework of this chapter.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.