Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail
Show Less

Multi-Modal Competition and the Future of Mail

  • Advances in Regulatory Economics series

Edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer

This compilation of original papers selected from the 19th Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics and authored by an international cast of economists, lawyers, regulators and industry practitioners addresses perhaps the most significant problem that has ever faced the postal sector – electronic competition from information and communication technologies. This has increased significantly over the last few years with a consequent serious drop in mail volume.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 4: Failure to Implement the Postal Directive in the EU and EEA: Public and Private Enforcement of State Liability

Alessandra Fratini and Mariacristina Bottino

Extract

4. Failure to implement the Postal Directive in the EU and EEA: public and private enforcement of state liability* Alessandra Fratini† and Mariacristina Bottino‡ 04 ‡ 05 1 INTRODUCTION The Postal Directive (Directive 2008/6/EC),1 as all EU directives, contains a timetable for its implementation: to be transposed into national laws by 31 December 2010 or 31 December 2012 for those member states who have secured a two-year extension.2 Any failure to do so on time or in a correct manner would lead to infringement proceedings. In January 2011 the European Commission indeed activated the infringement procedure provided for in Arts 258 and 260(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)3 against five of the 16 member states that were required to transpose the Postal Directive into their domestic law by 31 December 2010.4 Moving from the current implementation status of the Postal Directive, this chapter will address member states’ liability and other possible consequences of a lack of transposition of the Directive in the context of both public and private enforcement. Section 2 reviews the relevant categories of infringement under EU law and then provides an overview of the ‘public enforcement’ remedies available to the Commission and to fellow member states for infringement of EU law. Section 3 refers to the innovative tool introduced by the Lisbon Treaty under Art. 260(3) TFEU while Section 4 reviews the defenses that a member state can put forward in this respect. Section 5 further addresses the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.