The New Limits of Education Policy
Show Less

The New Limits of Education Policy

Avoiding a Tragedy of the Commons

Roger Benjamin

Using a political economy framework to analyze the current problems facing US postsecondary education, The New Limits of Education Policy tackles the questions surrounding the future of higher education. The study provides an explanation of why improvement of teaching and learning is not a high priority for the stakeholders involved. Roger Benjamin explains why heightened recognition by the State of the importance of human capital in the knowledge economy will create the external conditions that will, in turn, create the need for an altered incentive system for these stakeholders. He goes on to make a case for additional positive incentives that would reward behavior that improves teaching and learning.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Seven Red Herrings About Higher Education Assessment

Roger Benjamin


Why are many stakeholders in higher education reluctant to accept standardized assessments?87 By standardized assessment I mean the questions, conditions of administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined, standardized manner. The list of skeptical stakeholders includes faculty, administrators, boards of trustees, accrediting groups, and membership associations. I will state the most familiar arguments used against standardized assessments in higher education that have confused participants on each side of the debate about the need for and the possibility of new benchmarks of student learning outcomes. We do need appropriate standardized assessments to permit faculty and administrators to signal how well they are doing in comparison with other higher education institutions. Most importantly, we need good standardized assessment instruments to encourage the development of assessment strategies that directly assist faculty to improve teaching and learning in a systemic, continuous improvement way.88 In fact, appropriate standardized instruments that permit comparison are a necessary condition for progress in developing a more systematic approach to assessment in higher education. However, nuance is important here. While standardized tests are necessary they are not sufficient for assessment to be integrated with teaching and learning within institutions. Formative assessments developed by faculty at institutions are also critically important. Why has this view not yet prevailed? If the responses to the seven red herrings are convincing, why do they constantly recur? I conclude this chapter with speculations about the reasons for this. Here, then, are seven assertions, repeatedly expressed shibboleths,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.