Chapter 2: The Homo juridicus: towrds a redefinition of normative legal science
The introduction to this book showed that there is much work to be done pertaining to the aims and methods of legal science, the impact of which has reached a point where legal academics themselves can no longer distinguish the core of their activity. This is why, in Chapter I, four questions about the law were identifi ed to facilitate legal academics in classifying their research. This should not make us forget, however, what is at the core of the legal discipline. The main thesis of this book is that legal science is primarily formed by the question of how the law ought to read. Before elaborating on this point further, this chapter will investigate the requirements that an academic discipline should meet in general (nos. 20–22). Normative legal science is then identified as the core of the legal discipline in nos. 23–26, followed by an account of what could be the theoretical underpinning of this view (nos. 27–29).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.