Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy
Show Less

Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy

Edited by Michael Pickhardt and Aloys Prinz

Leading scholars examine recent evidence from theoretical and empirical research on tax compliance and tax evasion, and provide an in-depth analysis of underlying methods. Strategies to fight tax evasion are evaluated and the motivations behind it are explored, as are the impact and size of the shadow economy in Europe. As well as promoting a better understanding of the issues, this book intends to stimulate further debate and, in so doing, broaden the exchange of ideas and concepts.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Designing Alternative Strategies to Reduce Tax Evasion

James Alm


James Alm 2.1 INTRODUCTION Although it is often said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes, taxes at least are far from inevitable, and individuals take a variety of actions to reduce their tax liabilities. Some are legal ‘tax avoidance’ activities, such as income splitting, postponement of taxes and tax arbitrage across income that faces different tax treatment. ‘Tax evasion’ consists of illegal and intentional actions taken by individuals to reduce their legally due tax obligations. Individuals and firms can evade taxes by underreporting incomes, sales or wealth; by overstating deductions, exemptions or credits; or by failing to file appropriate tax returns. Indeed, there is widespread, if somewhat imprecise, evidence that tax evasion is extensive and commonplace in nearly all countries, especially in developing countries. Tax evasion is important for many reasons. The most obvious is that it reduces tax collections, thereby affecting taxes that compliant taxpayers face and public services that citizens receive. Beyond these revenue losses, evasion creates misallocations in resource use when individuals alter their behavior to cheat on their taxes, such as in their choices of hours to work, occupations to enter and investments to undertake. Its presence requires that government expend resources to detect noncompliance, to measure its magnitude and to penalize its practitioners. Noncompliance alters the distribution of income in arbitrary, unpredictable and unfair ways. Evasion may contribute to feelings of unjust treatment and disrespect for the law. It affects the accuracy of macroeconomic statistics. More broadly, it is not...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.