Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy
Show Less

Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy

Edited by Michael Pickhardt and Aloys Prinz

Leading scholars examine recent evidence from theoretical and empirical research on tax compliance and tax evasion, and provide an in-depth analysis of underlying methods. Strategies to fight tax evasion are evaluated and the motivations behind it are explored, as are the impact and size of the shadow economy in Europe. As well as promoting a better understanding of the issues, this book intends to stimulate further debate and, in so doing, broaden the exchange of ideas and concepts.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: The Shadow Economy and Systemic Transformation: The Case of Poland

Bogdan Mróz


Bogdan Mróz 6.1 INTRODUCTION The shadow economy is an inseparable part of today’s economic systems. In economies in transition, such as Poland and other post-communist countries, the weight of unregistered forms of economic activity is substantial, but researchers have yet to reach agreement on its quantitative measurement. Over the past two decades of systemic transformation in Poland, shadow economy estimates ranged between 15 per cent and more than 27 per cent of GDP, according to methods picked by individual experts or researcher centres. The switchover from a centrally planned economy to the free market system in Poland has fundamentally changed various walks of social and economic life, and affected the behaviour of economic agents (companies and consumers). The initial phase, sometimes referred to as ‘systemic interregnum’ or ‘systemic vacuum’, was conducive to the emergence of new forms of unregistered income-earning activity, previously unknown in the socialist ‘economy of shortage’. As the new economic order’s foundations and institutions grew stronger, some shadow economy forms characteristic of the pioneer stage of Polish capitalism were disappearing, to be replaced by others, commensurate with the new realities and taking advantage of, for example, a vague regulatory environment, lack of inspection mechanisms, economic policy mistakes etc. (Kloc, 1998). The sheer magnitude of unregistered economic activity entails a host of adverse consequences for the official sector, stifling microeconomic efficiency (Bouev, 2002). The most perceptible of these include lost or reduced revenue of the Treasury, affecting the public finances via budget deficit, and thus impeding the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.