Temporary versus Permanent Legislation
Chapter 4: Information and commitment
In the previous chapters we examined the use of temporary legislation during strategic interaction between the legislature and citizens. We now turn to the use of temporary legislation between the legislature and interest groups. While the public can be considered an interest group, the distinction we draw by definition is that citizen behavior is malleable through residual effects like legal expression, while interest group behavior is not. Interest group behavior can certainly reflect normative updates due to an expressive effect, but this chapter focuses on the strategic problem when their behavior is fixed and independent of those effects. The interaction we examine falls under the general heading of asymmetric information. Interest groups or their lobbies possess information that may influence a legislative outcome, and they must decide whether or not to reveal it. This problem has been studied extensively, but the option to legislate temporarily or permanently is a nuance that has received little attention.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.