Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism
Show Less

Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism

Edited by Ben Saul

This Handbook brings together leading scholars and practitioners to examine the prolific body of international laws governing terrorism. It exhaustively covers the global response to terrorism in transnational criminal law, the international law on the use of force, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, the law of State responsibility, the United Nations Security Council, General Assembly, UN specialised bodies, and regional organisations. It also addresses special legal issues in dealing with terrorism such as gender, religion, victims of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and customary law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 18: Terrorism and self-determination

Elizabeth Chadwick


Lawful or legitimate self-determination violence can be distinguished from terrorism in terms of motivation and means at many levels. By way of rough analogy, states also employ ‘violence strategically for political ends on a regular basis – to maintain public order and national security’. As certain forms of state violence, including acts that are intended to spread terror, are ordinarily considered lawful, ‘the possibility must remain that some forms of political violence can be justifiable, and thereby escape condemnation as “terrorism”’. However, while violence may be justified in strategic, political and/ or legal terms, governments possess the monopoly on lawful force. This means that, depending on the status of the actor, the context of the act, the intended target and the result achieved, violence may or may not entail criminal responsibility. Therefore, once overly broad labels such as ‘terrorist’ and ‘terrorism’ are incorporated in legal prohibitions, difficulties can arise. Employing such labels extra-judicially to describe any enemy – including self-determination movements – can thus be made ‘a vital step in the struggle with that enemy – it is like winning a court victory that identifies your opponent as a criminal’. States have long been encouraged to condemn acts of violence perpetrated for political ends.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.