Comparative Labor Law
Show Less

Comparative Labor Law

Edited by Matthew W. Finkin and Guy Mundlak

Economic pressure and corporate policies, both transnational and domestic, have placed labor law under severe stress. National responses are so deeply embedded in institutions reflecting local traditions that meaningful comparison is daunting. This book assembles a team of experts from many countries, drawing on a rich variety of comparative methods to capture changes in different countries and regions, emerging trends and national divergences.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The lasting influence of legal origins: Workplace discrimination, social inclusion and the law in Canada, the United States and the European Union

Kevin Banks, Roberta Nunin and Adriana Topo


This chapter will compare laws in Europe and North America seeking to eliminate discrimination and to achieve greater social inclusion in the workplace. While descriptive comparisons covering these subjects have been available for some time, there has been little analysis aimed at explaining international similarities and differences. We contribute to filling this gap. We show how fundamental differences in the way that different legal systems apprehend the concepts of workplace discrimination and equality emerged notwithstanding the shared influence of United States (U.S.) equality rights jurisprudence. We then consider the very different roles of law and government in fostering social inclusion in Canada, the European Union (EU) and the U.S. We argue that the different types of discrimination addressed in precedent setting anti-discrimination cases in each jurisdiction led courts and legislators in Canada, the U.S. and Europe to develop legal principles and concepts first articulated in the U.S. in very different ways. Specifically, the focus of U.S. jurisprudence on race, Canadian jurisprudence on religion, and European jurisprudence on sex discrimination led eventually to the development of different paradigms of anti-discrimination law. In the U.S. the dominant paradigm became one of colour-blindness, whereas in Canada and the EU the paradigm was one of difference-consciousness. These paradigms shaped the ways in which discrimination was understood to arise, and how it should be remedied.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.