The US–China Trade Dispute
Show Less

The US–China Trade Dispute

Facts, Figures and Myths

Imad Moosa

While the Americans accuse China of damaging their economy, the Chinese claim their policies are legitimate and that the US has no right to dictate how the Chinese economy should be run. Imad Moosa addresses contentious issues including: whether the Chinese currency is undervalued, whether the undervaluation of the yuan, should it exist, is the cause of the US trade deficit with China (hence revaluation being a justifiable cure) and whether Chinese economic policies are immoral and illegal according to IMF and WTO rules.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: The US Trade Deficit as an American Problem: Leveraged Over-Indulgence

Imad Moosa


INTRODUCTION Historians attribute the collapse of the Roman Empire, which once seemed invincible, to three factors: (i) overstretched and overconfident military; (ii) moral deterioration; and (iii) fiscal profligacy. These factors are symptomatic of contemporary America. The US military is overstretched, fighting unnecessary wars here and there, some of which have nothing to do with the “war on terror” and a lot to do with the “war of terror”. The fact that the US military is overconfident is symbolized by Donald Rumsfeld’s belief, in his heyday, that the invasion of Iraq would be a “walk in the park” and by George W. Bush’s infamous statement of “mission accomplished”, not to mention the US’s catastrophic adventure in Vietnam. Moral deterioration is exemplified by the transfer of money from the average taxpayer to wealthy bankers under the pretext of “too big to fail”, Donald Trump’s call for free oil from Iraq and the control of the mineral resources of Afghanistan to compensate America for the “liberation” of these two countries, the authorization of torture and kidnapping by George Bush II, the glorification of war, the justification of profiteering by all necessary means, the rationalization as “natural” of extreme income and wealth inequality, contempt towards the rest of the world (symbolized by the do-as-I-say attitude), and the attitude of blaming others for its own problems. Fiscal profligacy, which is related to the first two factors, means extravagant and wasteful spending – living beyond one’s means and sustaining this kind of lifestyle by borrowing from others....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.