The US–China Trade Dispute
Show Less

The US–China Trade Dispute

Facts, Figures and Myths

Imad Moosa

While the Americans accuse China of damaging their economy, the Chinese claim their policies are legitimate and that the US has no right to dictate how the Chinese economy should be run. Imad Moosa addresses contentious issues including: whether the Chinese currency is undervalued, whether the undervaluation of the yuan, should it exist, is the cause of the US trade deficit with China (hence revaluation being a justifiable cure) and whether Chinese economic policies are immoral and illegal according to IMF and WTO rules.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 11: Concluding Thoughts

Imad Moosa

Extract

11. Concluding thoughts MYTHS, FACTS AND FIGURES The title of this book is The US–China Trade Dispute: Facts, Figures and Myths. Throughout the ten previous chapters we came across numerous myths, facts and figures, some of which will be spelled out in this chapter. The words “myths” and “facts” are typically used in articles on the US– China trade dispute, but it is frequently the case that the proclaimed facts are actually myths, and vice versa. The transformation of facts into myths and myths into facts follows from the ideologically-driven desire to prove a pre-conceived idea – on this occasion the idea that China is indulging in wrong-doing. Some of the genuine underlying myths have been identified by The Economist (2007b); these myths pertain to the proposition that revaluation of the yuan will work. The four myths are stated as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. There is overwhelming evidence that the yuan is grossly undervalued. China’s sharp increase in trade surplus is due to expansion in cheap imports. Imports from China destroy jobs and harm the American economy. Revaluation of the yuan will greatly reduce America’s trade deficit. The first of the four myths identified by The Economist is a myth because the evidence for the alleged yuan undervaluation is weak, fragmented and mixed. For a long time it was established that the yuan was undervalued because The Economist’s Big Mac index said so. Not any more: by modifying the Big Mac index to take into account the effect of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.