Nonprofit Organizations and the Intellectual Commons
Show Less

Nonprofit Organizations and the Intellectual Commons

Jyh-An Lee

Over the past twenty years, a number of nonprofit organizations (NPOs), such as Creative Commons, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Free Software Foundation have laid essential building blocks for intellectual-commons as a social movement. Through a detailed description of these NPOs and a series of in-depth interviews with their officials, this book demonstrates that NPOs have provided the social structures that are necessary to support the production of intellectual commons.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Associating nonprofit organizations with the commons environment

Jyh-An Lee


In Chapter 4, I described both the application of current dominant theories to NPOs in the commons environment and the limitations of these theories. My analysis in Chapter 4 is unidirectional and explores how NPOs function as a private response to a variety of market and government failures in the information society. Nevertheless, this analysis does not provide an adequate explanation for the commons environment being more suitable for NPOs than for for-profits to flourish. Although in the F/OSS arena, scholars have argued that ‘a passion for the ideology behind [F]OSS seems to be what prevents many organizations from becoming profit-earning entities,’ most current literature has not provided a detailed explanation of the close links between the nature of the commons and NPOs. Therefore, in this chapter, I turn my attention to the commons environment and the distinctive traits that cause NPOs to proliferate in it. Roger A. Lohmann is probably the first scholar to identify the link between NPOs and the commons. Lohmann uses the term commons to refer to the entire nonprofit sector because he believes that NPOs are involved in a vast array of relationships between benefactors, intermediaries, and beneficiaries in which associative communities can operate freely. Linked to the Greek term koinonia, Lohmann uses the term ‘the commons’ to emphasize free participation, common purpose, shared goods, a sense of mutuality, and a commitment to fairness. Based on Lohmann’s theory, Dart further refers to the commons as ‘an organizational space containing activity focused on pro-social behavior, mutuality, voluntary labor, and production of collective goods.’

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.