Constructing European Intellectual Property
Show Less

Constructing European Intellectual Property

Achievements and New Perspectives

  • European Intellectual Property Institutes Network series

Edited by Christophe Geiger

This detailed study presents various perspectives on what further actions are necessary to provide the circumstances and tools for the construction of a truly balanced European intellectual property system. The book takes as its starting point that the ultimate aim of such a system should be to ensure sustainable and innovation-based economic growth while enhancing free circulation of ideas and cultural expressions. Being the first in the European Intellectual Property Institutes Network (EIPIN) series, this book lays down some concrete foundations for a deeper understanding of European intellectual property law and its complex interplay with other fields of jurisprudence as well as its impact on a broad array of spheres of social interaction. In so doing, it provides a well needed platform for further research.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 16: Database rights: success or failure? The chequered yet exciting journey of database protection in Europe

Estelle Derclaye

Extract

It is a somewhat scary thought but there it is: it is over 20 years since the European database debate started. And the debate is still raging. Indeed, the Commission issued its initial proposal in 1992, eventually giving birth to the Database Directive in March 1996. But it had started considering harmonization of database protection as early as 1986. As is known, the Directive harmonized copyright law for databases, providing protection only for their structure and only if the selection or arrangement is the author’s own intellectual creation, and created a brand new sui generis right protecting the investment in collecting, verifying and/or presenting the contents of databases. Both before and after its adoption, the sui generis right has been, and still is very much criticized for its overreaching protective strength, which is not counter-balanced by sufficient limits. Most Member States implemented the Directive in time in 1998 or thereabouts. Much litigation for infringement of the sui generis right ensued in many Member States, culminating in 2004 with the four rulings of the Court of Justice in the BHB and Fixtures Marketing cases. Those decisions in many ways clarified and limited part of the scope of the sui generis right, quietening somewhat the initial criticisms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.