The Big Society Debate
Show Less

The Big Society Debate

A New Agenda for Social Welfare?

Edited by Armine Ishkanian and Simon Szreter

The book is divided into two sections, history and policy, which together provide readers with a historically grounded, internationally informed, and multidisciplinary analysis of the Big Society policies. The introduction and conclusion tie the strands together, providing a coherent analysis of the key issues in both sections. Various chapters in this study examine the limitations and consider the challenges involved in translating the ideas of the Big Society agenda into practice.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 6: Charities, Voluntary Organisations and Non-governmental Organisations in Britain Since 1945

Matthew Hilton

Extract

6. Charities, voluntary organisations and non-governmental organisations in Britain since 1945 Matthew Hilton 1 Introduction The Big Society is a deeply historical concept. According to one of its chief proponents, Phillip Blond, the author of Red Tory, ‘civil society’ has ‘disappeared’. While the state and the marketplace have continued to thrive, ‘All other sources of independent autonomous power have been crushed. We no longer have, in any effective independent way, local government, churches, trade unions, cooperative societies, publicly funded educational institutions, civic organisations or locally organised groups that operate on the basis of more than single issues’ (Blond 2010a, p. 3). For Blond, this is part of a much deeper malaise in our social fabric such that ‘something is seriously wrong in Britain’. To put it crudely, and Blond certainly does, ‘things were better in the past’ (2010a, p. 2). Blond and Conservative politicians have built upon a narrative of decline prevalent among proponents of the social capital thesis. Most commonly associated with Robert Putnam, the thesis holds that citizens no longer ‘join in’. They no longer attach themselves to the forms of associational life that sustain social bonds, build trust and ultimately strengthen democratic participation (Prochaska, 1988; Putnam, 2000; Prochaska, 2006). Certainly, there is much evidence to support such an account. Membership of the two main political parties has slipped from over 3 million to just under half a million over the past 50 years (Marshall, 2009). Over the same period, membership of the churches fell by around one-third...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.