The Standard of Review in WTO Dispute Settlement
Show Less

The Standard of Review in WTO Dispute Settlement

Critique and Development

Ross Becroft

This detailed book critiques how the World Trade Organization scrutinizes domestic measures to determine compliance with the WTO Agreements. This scrutiny, known as the standard of review, is particularly relevant when WTO panels are examining measures involving controversial domestic policy issues. The author argues that the current WTO standard of review is inadequate and a flexible standard based on the responsibilities that WTO members have retained for themselves under the WTO Agreements is preferable. This new standard of review would better reflect the autonomy contemplated for members under the WTO rules and reduce scope for the contention that the WTO overreaching its mandate.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The Application of a New Standard of Review to Selected Non-trade Remedy Agreements

Ross Becroft


7.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter, I will be examining how the new standard of review will apply to three WTO Agreements: the SPS Agreement, the TBT Agreement and GATT 1994. The first major reason for selecting these agreements is that each of them involves differing levels of responsibility for members in the carrying out of their WTO obligations. This helps to demonstrate how the new standard would apply in different situations. The relation between these agreements may be described as a sliding scale, where the SPS and TBT Agreements and GATT 1994, in that order, prescribe a lesser degree of responsibility for domestic authorities to exercise any kind of oversight in relation to measures. This is to be contrasted with the trade remedy agreements, where formal review processes are required to be followed by domestic authorities. In addition, many of the other WTO Agreements, such as GATS, the Agreement on Customs Valuation or the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures are quite similar to GATT 1994, in that they do not retain specific competencies for members to safeguard WTO commitments.1 1 GATS, art VI (2)(a) does prescribe some generalized review obligations. The first sentence of this Article provides: ‘Each Member shall maintain or institute as soon as practicable judicial, arbitral or administrative tribunals or procedures which provide, at the request of an affected service supplier, for the prompt review of, and where justified, appropriate remedies for, administrative decisions affecting trade in services.’ This would not be a sufficient basis to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.