Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law
Show Less

Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law

  • The IUCN Academy of Environmental Law series

Edited by Yves Le Bouthillier, Miriam Alfie Cohen, Jose Juan Gonzalez Marquez, Albert Mumma and Susan Smith

This timely book explores the complex relationship between the alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment. There is every reason to believe that these issues are in many ways interdependent. However this book demonstrates that there are situations where alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment appear to be in a fraught relationship. The contributing authors illustrate that the role played by law in this relationship, whether at the international or national level, will vary depending on the situation and will be more successful at pursuing environmental justice in some cases than in others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Whaling and Dealing: Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling, Politics and Poverty

Ed Couzens


* Ed Couzens 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ABORIGINAL SUBSISTENCE WHALING GENERALLY Around the world, a number of aboriginal groups such as the Inuit/Eskimo people and the Makah Indian tribe1 in the United States and the Chukotka people in Russia hunt and kill whales. This aboriginal subsistence whaling (ASW) is exempt from the International Whaling Commission (IWC) 1982 ‘moratorium’2 on commercial whaling. The ASW exemption was placed in the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, signed at Washington, 2 December 1946 (ICRW), to preserve aboriginal cultures for which whaling was culturally significant and to alleviate poverty among those peoples. Although ASW is exempt from the moratorium, the IWC places annual quotas on aboriginal takes.3 Currently, there is controversy over whether four Japanese coastal communities should be classified as aboriginal subsistence whalers – at present they are not. Opponents of such recognition claim that these communities engage in commercial whaling, rather than aboriginal subsistence whaling; Japan maintains that the distinction is artificial. Japan, for instance, explained at the 46th annual meeting of the IWC that it held the view that ‘its small-type whaling had the same characteristics as aboriginal subsistence whaling’ and that ‘hence a similar treatment should be considered’ (IWC, 1994, p. 17). According to Komatsu and Misaki, commercial whaling is ‘a straightforward proposition: whaling undertaken for financial gain made through selling the catch’; and that one would presume therefore that ‘it would then differ from aboriginal subsistence whaling, which you would not expect to be based upon financial transactions’. However, they contend,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.