Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law
Show Less

Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law

Edited by Yves Le Bouthillier, Miriam Alfie Cohen, Jose Juan Gonzalez Marquez, Albert Mumma and Susan Smith

This timely book explores the complex relationship between the alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment. There is every reason to believe that these issues are in many ways interdependent. However this book demonstrates that there are situations where alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment appear to be in a fraught relationship. The contributing authors illustrate that the role played by law in this relationship, whether at the international or national level, will vary depending on the situation and will be more successful at pursuing environmental justice in some cases than in others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The Role of Public Engagement in Achieving Environmental Justice

LeRoy C. (Lee) Paddock


LeRoy C. (Lee) Paddock* 7.1 INTRODUCTION Over the last 25 years significant environmental inequalities have been documented in the United States. Low income communities and communities with large minority populations are often exposed to more environmental hazards – waste management facilities, air pollution, degraded water – and are more vulnerable to the impacts of environmental catastrophes – witness hurricane Katrina – than higher income or majority communities. Studies have also demonstrated that fewer environmental enforcement resources are typically deployed in these communities. One reason for this situation is that lowincome communities and minority communities are frequently under-represented in government decision making. The opportunities for all members of affected communities to fully participate in governmental decision making is a problem that reaches well beyond the issue of environmental justice, but it is of particular concern in the context of environmental justice because of increased risks that many low-income and minority populations face. Historically, the most common approaches to public engagement in government decision making in the United States often: • occur too late in the decision making process to have a major impact on development decisions; • do not involve genuine consultations with communities; • fails to provide communities with the type of information and resources they need to have a real impact on decisions; • are not designed to address cultural issues that may limit participation; • may not take into account language and other constraints such as time, location and nature of meetings that may limit effective involvement. This situation is beginning to change as better approaches to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.