Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law
Show Less

Poverty Alleviation and Environmental Law

Edited by Yves Le Bouthillier, Miriam Alfie Cohen, Jose Juan Gonzalez Marquez, Albert Mumma and Susan Smith

This timely book explores the complex relationship between the alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment. There is every reason to believe that these issues are in many ways interdependent. However this book demonstrates that there are situations where alleviation of poverty and the protection of the environment appear to be in a fraught relationship. The contributing authors illustrate that the role played by law in this relationship, whether at the international or national level, will vary depending on the situation and will be more successful at pursuing environmental justice in some cases than in others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Embedding Social Justice in the Design of Environmental Regulation

Paul Martin


1 Paul Martin 9.1 INTRODUCTION Western resource management theory suggests that the optimal conservation strategy is to impose access constraints through the law, and then empower the economically competent users of constrained resources through trading and permits. This will maximise wealth (often represented as social optimality), and long-term environmental services for the majority. However, efficient conservation can embed social disadvantage for the vulnerable minority. Social cost is not an accidental ‘spillover’ of either environmental policing and markets, it is intrinsic. This chapter considers this issue and proposes procedural options to improve consideration of social justice in the design of environmental regulation. For the purposes of this chapter, environmental regulation is any state imposed legal constraint for the purpose of conserving natural resources. It includes exclusion and policing, environmental property rights, and restrictive licenses to use resources. This chapter argues that regardless of the constraint type there is an inherent potential for inequity, though its extent and significance varies with the vulnerability of those affected, the nature of the constraint, and the particular circumstances.2 Many social liberals hold the fond belief that because disproportionate resource consumption is an attribute of the rich, conservation will naturally benefit the poor, leading to an expectation that conservation and social justice are happy companions. Unfortunately this is not intrinsically so. Environmental law can exacerbate social injustice unless conscious steps are taken to address these risks. 9.2 SCARCITY AND THE VULNERABLE In nature, scarcity usually leads to the dominance of the powerful, adaptive and/or lucky. In...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.