Edited by Pauline Deutz, Donald I. Lyons and Jun Bi
Chapter 8: Bilateral symbiosis in Australia and the issue of geographic proximity
The central topic of this chapter is the spatial dimension of industrial symbiosis, applied particularly to the use of waste for environmental and commercial benefit. In it we examine the significance of geographic proximity and the related features of a network and short mental distance in establishing relationships in practice. Reference to waste raises the question of how waste is defined and what distinguishes it from a by-product. This and the other issues mentioned below are also addressed. Chertow (2000) described industrial symbiosis as separate organisations collectively exchanging materials, energy and water to their mutual advantage. Key features are inter-firm collaboration and geographic proximity. She subsequently developed the concept by stating a minimum criterion of a ‘3–2 heuristic’. This means that ‘at least three different entities must be involved in exchanging at least two different resources to be counted as a basic type of industrial symbiosis’ (Chertow, 2007, 12). In this article also, Chertow emphasises the criticality of geographic proximity as a prerequisite for industrial symbiosis.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.