Edited by Francisco Cabrillo and Miguel A. Puchades-Navarro
Chapter 1: Presuppositions in the evaluation of rules
I have often asked my fellow economists to pay more attention to the rules, to the constitution, that define the order within which economic and political behavior takes place, and from which end-states emerge. I have been continuously disappointed by the failure of my peers to express an interest in, or even to understand the presuppositions of, my argument. The separation between constitutional politics and ordinary politics is seldom recognized; hence, the important implications of the distinction are not examined. Politics, as observed and widely interpreted, readily becomes an arena of conflict, with winners and losers identified. By contrast, the setting for constitutional politics involves the search for agreed-upon rules that define ‘games’ from which mutual gains are anticipated by all participants. Failing some presupposition that members of the body politic agree on the ultimate rules, how can the polity, as a collective entity, be legitimized at all?
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.