Edited by Francisco Cabrillo and Miguel A. Puchades-Navarro
Chapter 14: Regulator preferences and lobbying efforts in rent-seeking contests
Standard public choice analysis of the political allocation of resources among competing interest groups has generated a growing literature on rent-seeking. In a typical rent-seeking contest artificially created rents are allocated in the political market, and players compete for these, investing resources in a contest that resembles a lottery. In an imperfectly discriminating contest – as considered in this chapter – players devote efforts to increase the likelihood of obtaining rent. This leads to an inefficient allocation of resources, with the inefficiency measured as the overall amount of rent-seeking invested in by players. However, this insight ignores the mechanism by which rents are awarded. By assuming that only relative efforts alter the allocation of the rent, this rules out regulator preferences. These can, however, play a significant role. Some authors have incorporated ideology or political preferences into the analysis of lobbying, such as Martimort and Semenov (2007a, 2007b, 2008) from a theoretical standpoint, or McKay (2010) from an empirical one.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.