Microfoundations Reconsidered
Show Less

Microfoundations Reconsidered

The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective

Pedro Garcia Duarte and Gilberto Tadeu Lima

The highly regarded contributors to the book argue that the standard narrative of microfoundations is likely to be unreliable. They therefore re-examine the history of the relationship of microeconomics and macroeconomics, starting from their emergence as self-consciously distinct fields within economics in the early 1930s. They seek to go beyond the conventional history that is often told and written by practicing economists. From different perspectives they challenge the association of microfoundations with Robert Lucas and rational expectations and offer both a more complete and a deeper reading of the relationship between micro and macroeconomics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Microfoundations: A Decisive Dividing Line between Keynesian and New Classical Macroeconomics?

Michel De Vroey


Michel De Vroey INTRODUCTION The transition from Keynesian IS-LM macroeconomics to dynamic stochastic macroeconomics deserves to be labeled as a scientific revolution à la Kuhn. This expression refers to an episode in the history of a discipline where a period of normal science is disturbed by the persistent existence of apparently insoluble puzzles and a drive to push the agenda and the research methods in new directions. This is accompanied by thundering declarations of war (for example, Keynesian theory is dead), a confrontation between the young and the old generation, the rise of new stars in the profession and the eclipse of old ones. The relevance of the scientific revolution hinges on the existence of a ‘before’ and an ‘after’, with a well-delineated series of events in between, so that the type of work members of the community are engaged in after the revolution bears little resemblance to earlier practices. The revolution in macroeconomics resulted from a sequence of episodes related both to the intricacies of the internal development of the discipline and to outside events. Friedman (1968) and Lucas ([1972] 1981) recounted the story of the real effects of monetary expansion in a non-Keynesian way, thereby disqualifying the policy-menu idea associated with the Phillips curve. The emergence of stagflation in the 1970s was proclaimed to be a real-time experiment that confirmed Friedman’s predictions about the inability of monetary policy to have a long-lasting effect on employment (Friedman 1968). Lucas and Rapping’s work (1969) extending the sphere of equilibrium analysis began...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.