The Economics of Edwin Chadwick
Show Less

The Economics of Edwin Chadwick

Incentives Matter

Robert B. Ekelund Jr and Edward O. Price III

The authors detail Sir Edwin Chadwick’s sophisticated conceptions of moral hazard, common pool problems, asymmetric information, and theory of competition, all of which differ starkly from those promulgated by Adam Smith and other classical economists. Also examined are Chadwick’s views on government versus market role in dealing with problems created by natural monopoly, and whether some or all market problems justify government regulation or alterations of property rights. The authors investigate Chadwick’s utilitarian approach to labor, business cycles, and economic growth, contrasting his modern view with those of his classical economic contemporaries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The Economics of Sanitation and the Utilitarian Agenda

Robert B. Ekelund Jr and Edward O. Price III


INTRODUCTION The whole process and engineering of sanitation reform is often (and justly) regarded as Chadwick’s greatest achievement. Less recognized, perhaps, are the roles that sanitation reform and his prior investigations into English poverty played in shaping his analysis of the entire structure of the British economy. His firm aim of ‘sanitizing’ England had deep and broad implications and consequences for both economic and social well-being. His investigations into poverty and sanitation shaped his analysis of the entire structure of the British economy. Specifically: ● ● ● ● Chadwick’s (and Mill’s) acute interest in the urban sanitation issue was heightened by the cholera epidemics in the 1830s, 1840s, and 1850s, and created an interest in reform for both medical and social reasons; Chadwick’s investigation into sanitation, prefaced by an analysis of the conditions and relative position of the poor in the 1830s, was an attempt to enhance the economic condition and productivity of labor and hence the overall economy; Chadwick’s argument for centralized provision of sanitation and other social and economic projects was premised on an analysis of the inability of local governments to promote productive activities, and; Chadwick’s theory of knowledge meant that voter apathy would prevail, he argued, at the local level. In short, sanitation reform and centralized control were the keys to improvement of labor productivity, the elimination of poverty, and, ultimately, economic growth. We analyze some of these matters in the present chapter. 183 EKELUND PRINT.indd 183 21/06/2012 13:38 184 The economics of Edwin Chadwick SIZE OF THE POVERTY...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.