Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Edited by Ugo Mattei and John D. Haskell

Events such as the global financial crisis have helped reveal that the drivers and contours of governance on a national and international level remain a mystery in many respects. Set in this context, this timely Research Handbook is the first to explicitly address the constitutive relationship between law and political economy. With scholarly contributions from diverse disciplinary and geographic backgrounds, this authoritative book covers, in three parts, topics surrounding money and markets, the relations of organization, and commodities, land and resources.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 27: Early Soviet property law in comparison with Western legal traditions

Boris N. Mamlyuk


For legal scholars committed to articulating a system of social order founded on equitable distribution of material resources, an understanding of ‘property’ as a legal form and an ideological construct seems foundational. Yet despite volumes of literature on liberal property ‘theory,’analysis of ‘illiberal’ property regimes remains sparse. Specifically, there has been remarkably little scholarship on the theoretical underpinnings of socialist property law, particularly in the crucial moment of transition to socialism and in the realm of personal property (versus private property rights over the means of production). A critical re-examination of early Soviet property law regimes remains necessary not only because of the persistence of socialist legal systems, but more importantly, because it has the potential to unlock a range of critical lines of inquiry into the nature, function and limits of property law as an ostensibly autonomous system of rules governing particular types of social relations (property relations). This chapter is a preliminary attempt to reconstruct how early Soviet jurists understood property, particularly against the backdrop of Soviet critiques of legal formalism, and to explore ways in which early Soviet critiques relate to ongoing theoretical debates regarding the nature of property in Anglophone jurisprudence.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.