Corporate Social Responsibility in Contemporary China
Show Less

Corporate Social Responsibility in Contemporary China

Jingchen Zhao

China’s recent economic transformation and integration into the world economy has coincided with increasing pressure for corporate law reform to make corporate social responsibility (CSR) integral to business and management strategy in China. This timely book critically analyses contemporary notions of CSR in China, discussing theory and practice alongside legal responses in this emerging field.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The evolution of corporate social responsibility in China: Historical evidence

Jingchen Zhao


Corporate objectives and the role and responsibility of the board of directors have been at the centre of academic debate for decades in various disciplines, including law, economics, management, politics and sociology. According to Hay and Gray, the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has travelled through three phases. It is worth discussing these phases to illuminate the progression and development of CSR as a modernized concept.Phase one was characterized by a ëprofit maximizerí tendency. This was the initial understanding of corporate objectives, based on the premise that individual self-interests would prevail and the sole objective of managers is to make profit for the shareholders. Profit maximization is generally regarded as an accurate description of corporate behaviour up to the 1920s. After the First World War there was a shift in business attitudes towards a more profit-oriented view, with the United States taking the lead and modernizing its economy. In the first half of the twentieth century, America was a society characterized by economic scarcity, with economic growth and wealth accumulation as the primary national goals. Corporations and other forms of business organizations were regarded as vehicles for eliminating economic scarcity. Social problems, such as working conditions, treatment of employees, child labour, environmental problems and protection of the interests of the community, were given little attention. The correlation between the welfare of the economy and the welfare of society was not perceived. Business ethics and social, environmental and philanthropic corporate responsibilities were relegated to subordinate concerns.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.