International Criminal Justice
Show Less

International Criminal Justice

Legitimacy and Coherence

Edited by Gideon Boas, William A. Schabas and Michael P. Scharf

International criminal justice as a discipline throws up numerous conceptual issues, engaging disciplines such as law, politics, history, sociology and psychology, to name but a few. This book addresses themes around international criminal justice from a mixture of traditional and more radical perspectives.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 6: International criminal justice and the past

Gerry Simpson

Extract

This chapter examines whether Leo Tolstoy’s ‘domain of jurisprudence’ – in the present case, international criminal justice – has a theory of history at all (albeit sublimated) and whether that theory of history can (or should) explain why or how certain events occur.2 This problem of history returns us to a moment in the institutional development of international criminal law written about previously by the author, and viewed by him as the field’s modern origin: such as the meetings of a commission of legal experts (including Robert Lansing, Ernest Pollock and James Brown Scott) convened by the delegates to the Versailles Peace Treaty at the end of the First World War.3 It was here for the first time that lawyer-internationalists had to grapple with the tension sketched by Tolstoy half a century earlier. In 1919, a committee was established at the Versailles Peace Conference to look into the question of war crimes trials for the defeated German elite (including the Kaiser). This represents the first occasion in international history when there was a somewhat methodical, official statement and interrogation of what would become some of the central problems in the field.4 This committee laboured under a curious but revealing title: The Commission on the Responsibilities of the Authors of the War. Their deliberations turned out to be more contentious than the Versailles statesmen might have anticipated. In effect, the Commission began to enact a series of distinctively twentieth century debates between opposing views of history.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.