International Criminal Justice
Show Less

International Criminal Justice

Legitimacy and Coherence

Edited by Gideon Boas, William A. Schabas and Michael P. Scharf

International criminal justice as a discipline throws up numerous conceptual issues, engaging disciplines such as law, politics, history, sociology and psychology, to name but a few. This book addresses themes around international criminal justice from a mixture of traditional and more radical perspectives.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Terrorism and international criminal law: questions of (in)coherence and (il)legitimacy

Ben Saul


The global reaction to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 (‘9/11’) has driven a rapid, complex and uncoordinated process of counter-terrorism norm-creation and implementation. These law-making processes have taken place on a variety of registers: vertical norm development;1 stronger transnational criminal cooperation; new measures in regional public law;2 the emergence of new ‘soft law’ standards;3 the mobilisation of non-State actors;4 the horizontal, cross-border borrowing and transplant of domestic legal norms across national legal systems;5 and the vertical uplifting of national norms onto the regional or international plane.6 Quite a few of these processes ‘operate below the level of highly publicized diplomatic conferences and treaty-making, but in aggregate … regulate and manage vast sectors of economic and social life through specific decisions and rulemaking’. The development of ‘hard and soft, global and regional law’8 addressing terrorism illustrates ‘the diversity of law-making approaches that inter- national law now offers and [shows] that the choice of process depends upon context, political preference and purpose’.9 The field of counter- terrorism is now thick with law. But that does not mean that the law is coherent or legitimate. The birth of new rules, institutions and processes can be anarchic. New norms overlay older, pre-existing legal forms and regimes, potentially generating normative, procedural and institutional ambiguity, fragmentation and collision. In this context, this chapter first assesses the state of international anti-terrorism law in relation to three notions of coherence:

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.