International Criminal Justice
Show Less

International Criminal Justice

Legitimacy and Coherence

Edited by Gideon Boas, William A. Schabas and Michael P. Scharf

International criminal justice as a discipline throws up numerous conceptual issues, engaging disciplines such as law, politics, history, sociology and psychology, to name but a few. This book addresses themes around international criminal justice from a mixture of traditional and more radical perspectives.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 12: International criminal justice and military perspectives

Geoffrey Skillen

Extract

Historically, there is little evidence of military commanders being among the most fervent champions of international humanitarian law (IHL), or the law of war. Sir Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris, the commander of the Royal Air Force’s Bomber Command during World War II, famously said: ‘Inter- national law can always be argued pro and con, but in this matter of the use of aircraft in war there is, it so happens, no international law at all.’1 It is unlikely that this view would allow for enthusiasm for any notion of international criminal justice. How should the contemporary institutionalisation of the idea of international criminal justice, embodied in the establishment of a number of international courts and tribunals since 1993, be viewed by military forces? Should they be wary of it, or should they welcome it? This chapter argues that a well-trained and disciplined military force that exhibits a commitment to the observance of IHL, has nothing to fear from international criminal justice and should adopt a ‘business-as-usual’ approach. In some respects, such a commitment can be seen as positive. In early 1995 the author was the Director-General of Legal Services of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and in that capacity, joined in the work towards the development of the Australian Government’s position on the proposal to establish an international criminal court. As with all treaty negotiations, there is an irresistible and natural inclination to approach the task with a view to achieving what a state regards as the optimum outcome for it,

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.