Recent Advances in the Analysis of Competition Policy and Regulation
Show Less

Recent Advances in the Analysis of Competition Policy and Regulation

Edited by Joseph E. Harrington Jr and Yannis Katsoulacos

Bringing scholars and policymakers to the frontiers of research and addressing the critical issues of the day, the book presents original important new theoretical and empirical results. The distinguished contributors include: P. Agrel, K. Alexander, J. Crémer, X. Dassiou, G. Deltas, F. Etro, L. Filistrucchi, P. Fotis, M. Gilli, J. Harrington Jr, T. Huertas, M. Ivaldi, B. Jullien, V. Marques, M. Peitz, Y. Spiegel, E. Tarrantino and G. Wood.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Social-Welfare-Enhancing Collusion and Trade

George Deltas, Alberto Salvo and Helder Vasconcelos


George Deltas, Alberto Salvo and Helder Vasconcelos1 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter offers additional results and extensions derived from the model in Deltas, Salvo and Vasconcelos (2012). That paper, which at the request of an editor focused on the consumer welfare effect of collusion, developed a model of geographically separated markets in which two horizontally differentiated goods are sold by cost asymmetric suppliers. The source of the cost asymmetry is spatial, in that in a given market a ‘home firm,’ with production facilities located in the market, competes with a ‘foreign firm’ that, to bring its differentiated product to market, needs to incur an additional cost of trade from its offshore plant. Our motivation, then as well as now, is: (1) the observation that several real world cartels have adopted a ‘home-market principle,’ whereby cartelized firms enjoy large shares in their home markets (Motta 2004; Harrington 2006),2 combined with (2) off-the-record speculation by executives in the Brazilian cement industry that spatial cartels, by curbing competitive cross-hauling, can raise social welfare. In Deltas et al. (2012), we show that consumer surplus and social welfare can increase on shifting from oligopolistic competition to full collusion (monopoly). Section 7.2 of this chapter briefly lays out the basic model of that paper. We then add an analysis of first-best social outcomes (Section 7.3) to the existing derivation of equilibrium outcomes under a Nash equilibrium in prices (imperfect competition) and the joint-profit maximizing cartel (full collusion). We show that a social planner would...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.