- Elgar original reference
Edited by Mara Olekalns and Wendi L. Adair
Individual differences in negotiation and conflict attract attention, and gender, one of these differences, has emerged as an area of particular importance. The significance of gender in negotiation is due to the salience of male and female roles in society as well as the concern that negotiation gaps foster inequities between men and women in the workplace and other social spheres (Bowles and McGinn, 2008a). Our chapter overviews major research findings relating to how and why women, on average, experience negotiation differently than men. We use social role theories as an organizing framework to summarize findings. We also review contextual and environmental factors to consider in interpreting these findings. Social role theories clarify areas that enhance or ameliorate gender differences. Through this lens we review work on communication mode, negotiation tasks, framing, stereotype threat, advocacy roles, and ambiguity. In addition to considering workplace negotiations, we incorporate discussions of gendered negotiations at home, with family, in political settings, and in negotiation ethics. We conclude with ideas relating to future research.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.