Global Economic Crisis
Show Less

Global Economic Crisis

Impacts, Transmission and Recovery

Edited by Maurice Obstfeld, Dongchul Cho and Andrew Mason

The expert contributors compare the recent crisis with earlier crises, explore international aspects of the crisis from the perspectives of financial markets and trade, and examine macroeconomic policy responses. In so doing, they address important questions including: How did this crisis differ from those suffered previously? How and why did flaws in financial markets contribute to the crisis? How important were global imbalances and global overheating in explaining the global meltdown? Did different pre-crisis fundamentals generate different post-crisis performances? And, how severe were the economic shocks to countries such as Korea and other emerging economies?
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The Great Trade Collapse and Contraction of Exports from Korea during the Global Crisis

Hangyu Lee


Hangyu Lee INTRODUCTION During the 2008–09 global crisis, an unpleasant fact unfolded for many international economists. A large body of literature reported that world trade shrank far more than world GDP did during the crisis and argued that this fact cannot be easily reconciled with standard international macroeconomic theories such as Backus et al. (1995). The phenomenon is called “the great trade collapse”, reflecting the unprecedented size of contraction in world trade, and the jargon has become popular among international economists. Responding to this unpleasant fact, many international economists have proposed various explanations for it.1 Among them, the compositional effect, the internationalized supply chain and the trade credit hypotheses have been most frequently discussed in related literature.2 The compositional effect hypothesis notes differences between durable goods and nondurable goods and emphasizes a special role of durable goods in generating volatility of trade flow. It is a well known fact among macroeconomists that demand is more volatile for durable goods than for nondurable goods. Also, it has recently been reported that durable goods account for a larger share of world trade than of world GDP. The direct implication of these differences between two types of goods is that world trade can be more volatile than world GDP. The presence of an internationalized supply chain provides another hypothesis. It is based on the observation that the production process has been involved increasingly with the vertical trading chain across many countries over time. According to Hummels et al. (2001), the trade flow...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.