Comparative Criminal Procedure
Show Less

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Edited by Jacqueline E. Ross and Stephen C. Thaman

This Handbook presents innovative research that compares different criminal procedure systems by focusing on the mechanisms by which legal systems seek to avoid error, protect rights, ground their legitimacy, expand lay participation in the criminal process and develop alternatives to criminal trials, such as plea bargaining, as well as alternatives to the criminal process as a whole, such as intelligence operations. The criminal procedures examined in this book include those of the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Russia, India, Latin America, Taiwan and Japan, among others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Silence, self-incrimination, and hazards of globalization

Jason Mazzone


Criminal prosecutions are easier for the government if, rather than the government having to prove its case, the accused confesses to the charges and the only issue that remains is the sentence to be imposed. However, when criminal cases are resolved on the basis of the accused’s own words, significant risks emerge. Most seriously, there is the risk that the accused has confessed falsely in order to avoid physical pain at the hands of his inquisitors. Or, perhaps, the accused was tricked into confessing after many rounds of clever questioning. Aside from these and related issues of the treatment of suspects and the reliability of resulting confessions, the government’s capacity to send people to prison vastly increases if it need not be burdened with investigating a case, compiling an evidentiary record, and proving its account in court. Conviction by confession also circumvents the role of the public – in the jury box and beyond – in monitoring the government’s uses and abuses of its prosecutorial tools.For more than four centuries adversarial systems of criminal justice have protected against these risks by recognizing two rights for those accused of crimes: the right to remain silent and the right (or privilege) against self-incrimination. These rights are distinct: the first protects the ability of the accused to say nothing when questioned during the course of criminal proceedings, while the second protects the accused from having his words used as evidence in the government’s case against him.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.