Comparative Criminal Procedure
Show Less

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Edited by Jacqueline E. Ross and Stephen C. Thaman

This Handbook presents innovative research that compares different criminal procedure systems by focusing on the mechanisms by which legal systems seek to avoid error, protect rights, ground their legitimacy, expand lay participation in the criminal process and develop alternatives to criminal trials, such as plea bargaining, as well as alternatives to the criminal process as a whole, such as intelligence operations. The criminal procedures examined in this book include those of the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Russia, India, Latin America, Taiwan and Japan, among others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Rumba justice and the Spanish jury trial

Elisabetta Grande


It is the aim of this chapter to provide a tentative description and explanation for what some scholars have described as the ongoing Americanization of the Continental European criminal process.1 I will examine the Spanish jury trial as a special case of a more general phenomenon. During the last few decades, European criminal procedures underwent extensive reforms and in Continental Europe the American adversary system often became the reference model for the overhaul.2 Legal institutions like hearsay prohibition, cross-examination, jury trial, or a governmental pre-trial investigation conducted by the police and the public prosecutor as opposed to a judicial pre-trial investigation conducted by the investigating magistrate, traveled from the American criminal procedure system to its European counterparts. Commentators often insist that American influence has made European criminal procedure more ‘adversarial’.3Did this diffusion of legal institutions from the American system really end up making European criminal procedure systems more adversarial?4 Is it plausible that, to the contrary, embedded in the new context, American legal arrangements lost their resemblance to the original model? I will argue that the American import did not alter the non-adversary structure of the recipient European criminal procedure but instead melded with and even strengthened the non-adversarial Continental way of searching for the truth. The present chapter tries to trace the influence of American criminal procedure on European legal institutions through a case study of the Spanish jury system, which was loosely modeled on that of the United States.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.