Comparative Criminal Procedure
Show Less

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Edited by Jacqueline E. Ross and Stephen C. Thaman

This Handbook presents innovative research that compares different criminal procedure systems by focusing on the mechanisms by which legal systems seek to avoid error, protect rights, ground their legitimacy, expand lay participation in the criminal process and develop alternatives to criminal trials, such as plea bargaining, as well as alternatives to the criminal process as a whole, such as intelligence operations. The criminal procedures examined in this book include those of the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Russia, India, Latin America, Taiwan and Japan, among others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Japan’s lay judge system

David T. Johnson


For this institution [of the American jury] is not only important in itself as a part of our court procedures; it has exerted a mighty influence upon other elements of the court process. Like iron filings around a magnet, many features of our law arrange themselves around the jury.(Benjamin Kaplan, 1961: 44)After a 60-year moratorium on lay participation in Japanese criminal justice, the lay judge system has thrown a stone into the pond of Japanese society, and the ripples are gradually, and deeply, spreading.(Satoru Shinomiya, 2010: 13)In May 2009, Japan began a new trial system in which six lay persons sit with three professional judges to adjudicate guilt and determine the sentence in serious criminal cases. This ‘lay judge system’ (saiban-in seido) places citizen participation at the center of Japanese criminal trials – and Japanese criminal justice – for the first time since 1943, when Japan’s original jury law was suspended after 15 years of fitful use (Johnson, 2002a: 42). At a time when adversarial trials in America are declining and perhaps even dying (Burns, 2009), Japan has implemented a trial reform that is so fundamental it could remake the country’s criminal justice system in the years to come. But that is no sure thing, for the new form of civilian participation might also be marginalized by Japanese legal professionals – prosecutors and professional judges especially – who have vested interests in maintaining their standard operating procedures.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.