Comparative Criminal Procedure
Show Less

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Edited by Jacqueline E. Ross and Stephen C. Thaman

This Handbook presents innovative research that compares different criminal procedure systems by focusing on the mechanisms by which legal systems seek to avoid error, protect rights, ground their legitimacy, expand lay participation in the criminal process and develop alternatives to criminal trials, such as plea bargaining, as well as alternatives to the criminal process as a whole, such as intelligence operations. The criminal procedures examined in this book include those of the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Russia, India, Latin America, Taiwan and Japan, among others.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: Strength, weakness, or both? On the endurance of the adversarial-inquisitorial systems in comparative criminal procedure

Máximo Langer


This book has gathered essays by a group of distinguished comparative criminal procedure scholars who are mostly based in Europe and the United States. Given that comparative criminal procedure is a small academic field, the 14 chapters by these 17 scholars can be considered representative of the main trends in comparative criminal procedure scholarship today. In addition, because a substantial number of these scholars have been in legal academia for less than twenty years, they not only represent the current generation of comparative criminal procedure scholars, but also indicate which directions this scholarship is likely to take in the upcoming years.Writing the epilogue of this Handbook provides a unique opportunity to make a general reflection on comparative criminal procedure as a field of research, inquiry and policy-making. This chapter will concentrate on the opposition between adversarial and inquisitorial systems in particular and between civil law and common law more generally, distinctions that have been at the center of comparative criminal procedure for a very long time. Contrary to claims that comparative criminal procedure is a new field, my first argument in this epilogue is that this collection of essays shows that contemporary comparative criminal procedure is an heir of this adversarial-inquisitorial and common law-civil law tradition.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.