Essays on Green Accounting
- Advances in Ecological Economics series
Chapter 13: Sustainability and substitutability: defending weak sustainability
A version of this chapter appeared in Environmental Values, 1998, Volume 5, number 1, pp. 75–82. ‘Sustainability’ has become a desirable objective among ecological economists, and seems also to have found favor with development agencies albeit not always convincingly. It is not surprising therefore that many environmentalists dismiss exclamations of support for sustainability as empty rhetoric. Needless to say different scholars have brought forth different perceptions of sustainability, not all of them reconcilable with each other. Questions are often raised over what exactly to sustain, at what level, for how long and for what purpose. The answers have remained imprecise, variant, and when cogently formulated they have not garnered consensus. For national accounting purposes, and therefore for the benefit of macroeconomics, sustainability relates narrowly to income estimation. But even within this narrow view the question may be asked if sustainability for the poor would mean perpetuation of their poverty? Or should it be taken to mean that they do not become even worse off? And yet, despite all these uncertainties there seems to be agreement that sustainability is probably a ‘good thing’, obviously superior to its opposite which may be called ‘unsustainability’.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.