European Union Human Rights Law
Show Less

European Union Human Rights Law

The Dynamics of Interpretation and Context

Marton Varju

The European Union’s jurisprudence is responsible for a complex body of human rights law which pursues a busy, multi-tiered agenda and is essential for the lawful and the effective operation and development of the EU polity and its legal order. This innovative book investigates the character of EU human rights law as shaped by the interplay between interpretation and context in the jurisprudence of EU courts.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The law of the ECHR and human rights in the EU

Marton Varju


In this chapter, we discuss how the dynamic relationship between EU human rights and ECHR law has affected the EU human rights jurisprudence. The law of the European Convention has been a major influence on the development of EU human rights law. It has served as an inspirational source for judicial interpretation and a source of borrowing law. The relationship between the two legal orders affected the entire EU jurisprudence which manifested in dynamic interpretative practices that governed the complementary considerations of divergence, alignment and flexibility. Divergence stands for the interpretative pressure on EU courts to avoid developing human rights law in breach of ECHR requirements. It is responsible, in part, for the interpretative reaction of alignment to the ECHR in EU human rights law which takes the form of borrowing directly from ECHR law or of considering in judicial interpretation the framework offered under the ECHR for the interpretation and application of human rights. The interpretative consideration of flexibility refers to the possibility for the EU to develop autonomous human rights law under the flexible ECHR framework and to adjudicate autonomously interferences with human rights, which pursue interests specific to the EU environment, within the margin of appreciation available for the EU in ECHR law. The dynamic interpretative practices following the considerations of divergence, alignment and flexibility assume a relationship of mutual observation between the parallel systems for the protection of human rights in the EU and under the ECHR.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.