Learning from Chengdu
Cities need to address two central questions in coordinating urban and rural development and facilitating new urbanization processes: where people should move to and where money to finance development will come from. Without enough economic support in coordinated urban–rural development, it is impossible to realize the free flow of population between urban and rural areas and upgrade living standards. Chengdu was only able to solve the problem of where people would go and avoid social turbulence caused by chaotic population flows and institutional changes when they had solved the problem of where sufficient money was to come from to provide employment and government revenue to equalize and improve public services. Chengdu illustrates that in order to coordinate urban–rural development and to facilitate economic growth it is generally more important and safer for a city to develop its own local resources and own-source revenue than to rely on higher levels of government.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.