The Evolution of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
Show Less

The Evolution of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law

Xiaoye Wang

China's Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) is one of the youngest and most influential antitrust laws in the world today. This book aims to provide a better understanding of the evolution of China’s AML to the international community through a collection of essays from the most prominent antitrust scholar in China, Professor Xiaoye Wang.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: The legal regulation of administrative restrictions on competition

Xiaoye Wang


In Western industrialized nations, the traditional role of anti-monopoly law is to curtail market power and prevent monopolies. Since competition could lead to monopolies, and full and unrestricted ‘freedom to contract’ could also lead to unreasonable socio-economic consequences, the state must play the role of referee over competition, regulating competition and protecting the market system, balancing market participants’ individual interests and the public interest. However, at China’s current stage of transition from a planned economy to a market economy system, under immature market conditions, and especially due to the lingering legacy of the planned economy, there are still all kinds of restrictions on competition. These stem mostly not from economic entities, but from administrative authorities left over from the old system. As a result, China’s Anti-Monopoly Laws should not only oppose economic monopolies, but also oppose administrative restrictions on competition. At this stage, regulating administrative restrictions on competition should in fact become the most important content of the law. ‘Administrative restrictions on competition’ refer to the abuse of authority by the government and its departments in order to restrict competition. These actions are viewed as ‘abuses of power’ because they do not fall under the government’s responsibility to maintain the socio-economic order or manage regular economic activities, and are also not part of the government’s macroeconomic controls of the national economy (such as fiscal, social, or production policies).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.