The Evolution of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
Show Less

The Evolution of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law

Xiaoye Wang

China's Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) is one of the youngest and most influential antitrust laws in the world today. This book aims to provide a better understanding of the evolution of China’s AML to the international community through a collection of essays from the most prominent antitrust scholar in China, Professor Xiaoye Wang.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 23: Reflections on the NDRC case against China Telecom and China Unicom

Xiaoye Wang


On 9 November 2011, the News 30' programme on CCTV – the Chinese national television broadcaster – reported that China Telecom and China Unicom were under investigation by the NDRC for suspected anticompetitive conduct in the broadband access market in China. The basic view of the antitrust authority in this case was that China Telecom and China Unicom had used their dominant position in the broadband access market to charge competitors high fees for Internet access, with a significant negative impact on fair competition in the broadband access market. If the evidence is solid and the facts are found to be accurate, the two enterprises may face fines of hundreds of millions or even over a billion CNY. Indeed, Article 47 of the Anti-Monopoly Law provides that a company in violation of the law shall be fined between 1 and 10 per cent of its total turnover in the preceding year. Over a year has passed since the CCTV broadcast. During this period, no significant progress was made in this case, except for statements on 2 December 2011 on the websites of the two companies under investigation. These statements claimed that the companies had submitted to an NDRC application to stop the investigation, and that they had undertaken to ‘rectify’ their conduct (in other words, bring it into compliance with the law). About a year later, in December 2012, Xu Kunlin, the Director-General of the NDRC's Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau, discussed this case during a conference.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.