Handbook of Governance and Security
Show Less

Handbook of Governance and Security

Edited by James Sperling

The Handbook of Governance and Security examines the conceptual evolution of security governance and the different manifestations of regional security governance. In particular, James Sperling brings together unique contributions from leading scholars to explore the role of institutions that have emerged as critical suppliers of security governance and the ever-widening set of security issues that can be viewed profitably through a governance lens.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 30: Collective Security Treaty Organization

Stephen Aris


The collapse of the Soviet Union left behind a huge territorial space divided between 15 newly independent states (NIS) that had previously been interconnected for seven decades. These NISs were faced with reconciling the competing priorities of managing a common interdependent legacy and asserting a new independent path. The immediate solution to the former was the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). After a decade of limited progress in security cooperation and growing impatience with certain CIS members’ attitude towards the CIS, the Putin regime in the Russian Federation spearheaded the creation of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in 2002. Russia was joined by those CIS members most interested in multilateral security coordination and willing to work to this end with Moscow. The CSTO can be broadly characterized as evolving through two periods since its formation. During the mid-2000s, its loosely defined attempt to widen the CIS security agenda and develop its structures produced few tangible results. Instead, its main role was that of a ‘legitimacy enhancer’ for its members' domestic security policy. From the late 2000s onwards, owing to a concern that it was losing relevance, Moscow has pushed a series of programs aimed at enhancing the CSTO’s viability as a ‘collective security’ actor. This agenda prioritizes regime security and state stability of its members as the primary, and only, referent objects of its activities.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.