Women in STEM Careers International Perspectives on Increasing Workforce Participation, Advancement and Leadership
International Perspectives on Increasing Workforce Participation, Advancement and Leadership
Edited by Diana Bilimoria and Linley Lord
Chapter 10: Gender equality interventions in the STEM fields: Perceptions, successes and dilemmas
The under-representation of women in education and occupations in the STEM fields is a global phenomenon and is widely documented (Blickenstaff, 2005; Burke and Mattis 2007; Bystydzienski and Bird 2006; Etzkowitz, Kemelgor and Uzzi, 2000; Shen, 2013). Although some progress is made (Shen, 2013), women face challenges in almost all career phases and functions (EU, 2008; WOPI, 2011). Many explanations have been given, but less attention has been paid to studying the possibilities and activities towards changing this situation. However, in recent years, the attention to evaluate gender equality interventions and programs has increased (Cronin and Roger 1999). Projects aiming at creating sustainable gender equality have proven complex (Acker, 2000; Benschop, Mills, Mills and Tienari, 2012; Bilimoria, Joy and Liang, 2008) and are accompanied by many dilemmas (Acker, 2000; Hearn, 2000; Nentwich, 2006). Although increasing numbers of governments, universities and research institutions seem convinced that gender equality policies are needed in order to increase the number of women in science, these policies continue to meet with open resistance, and they are considered highly controversial (Cockburn, 1991; Connell, 2006; Crosby et al., 2005; Hing et al., 2002; Van den Brink and Stobbe, 2014). Equality programs are often seen as the opposite of career policies based on merit and individual advancement (Bacchi, 1996; Noon, 2010; Tienari et al., 2009). Equality initiatives are then often framed in terms of dilemmas; with diversity, equal opportunities on the one hand, and merit and individual advancement on the other (Lamont, 2009). As a result, gender-equality programs are often received with ambivalence.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.