Research Handbook on EU Private International Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on EU Private International Law

Edited by Peter Stone and Youseph Farah

The harmonisation of private international law in Europe has advanced rapidly since the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam. Most aspects of private international law are now governed or at least affected by EU legislation, and there is a substantial and growing body of case-law from the European Court as well as the courts of the Member States. This timely Handbook addresses key questions and problems that currently exist in the rules of private international law laid down by European Union regulations.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Defamation and privacy and the Rome II Regulation

David Kenny and Liz Heffernan


When the Rome II Regulationentered into force on 11 January 2009, it was a milestone in the harmonisation of European Private International Law. It was the culmination of a very long process, and the fulfilment of a very old aspiration of the European project. Agreement on rules for choice of law in contract had emerged quickly; agreement for non-contractual obligations took a great deal longer to come to fruition. Even as consensus emerged, there was one substantial sticking point on which there was seemingly no room for compromise: defamation, and other torts relating to privacy and personality that have an impact on the freedom of expression. Within the realm of tort, defamation creates particular issues, not least because it is intimately bound up with fundamental rights – the right of free speech on the one hand, and on the other the right to good name, privacy and personality rights. There is universal recognition of the importance of these principles throughout the European Union, and in the human rights instruments to which the Member States are party, but this is where commonality ends. These rights must be balanced against one another, and there is a variety of views across the EU as to how this balance should be struck. The addition of a transnational element – when the plaintiff and defendant are domiciled in different States, or when the harm is manifest beyond national borders – and the issue becomes ‘an international horizontal conflict between fundamental rights’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.