Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements
Show Less

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Edited by Hein-Anton van der Heijden

This Handbook uniquely collates the results of several decades of academic research in these two important fields. The expert contributions successively address the different forms of political citizenship and current approaches and recent developments in social movement studies. Salient social movements in recent history are explored in depth, covering the environmental, women’s, international human rights, urban, Tea Party, and animal rights movements. Social movements and political citizenship in the ‘global South’: China, India, Africa, and the Arab World, are discussed, presenting a novel empirical insight into these fields of study.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Urban citizenship

Patricia Burke Wood


‘Urban citizenship’ encompasses many phenomena and approaches. It may refer to a form of citizenship in terms of its scale of governance and belonging, distinguishing itself from national citizenship. It may also refer to a particular type of citizenship and belonging that is cosmopolitan and civic in nature, rather than ‘national’ in an ethnic sense. This cosmopolitan citizenship is often rooted in a vision of such citizenship as a political subjectivity that is produced by the diversity of the city as it continually draws and renews its population from elsewhere and/or the city as a ‘difference machine’ (Isin, 2001; Bauböck, 2003). It can refer to the ways in which citizenship is in and of the city, and thus specifically and inherently urban, such as through the use of public space for protest or through technologies of discipline and surveillance. While these distinctions matter, these forms all overlap. ‘Urban citizenship’ often focuses on social movements within the city, and in turn may refer to three related and often coinciding practices: struggle for rights within the city, struggle that employs the city as an instrument or platform, and struggle for the ‘right to the city’ in a Lefebvrian sense (discussed further below).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.