Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements
Show Less

Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements

Edited by Hein-Anton van der Heijden

This Handbook uniquely collates the results of several decades of academic research in these two important fields. The expert contributions successively address the different forms of political citizenship and current approaches and recent developments in social movement studies. Salient social movements in recent history are explored in depth, covering the environmental, women’s, international human rights, urban, Tea Party, and animal rights movements. Social movements and political citizenship in the ‘global South’: China, India, Africa, and the Arab World, are discussed, presenting a novel empirical insight into these fields of study.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Resource mobilization and social and political movements

Bob Edwards and Melinda Kane


The 1960s and early 1970s were marked by dramatic social conflict within most Western societies. The social movement protagonists whose political, social, and cultural challenges often claimed center-stage in those dramas, left a diverse and enduring legacy. In the decades since the 1960s, the political, social, and cultural significance of social movements has become widely recognized. Their agendas and collective action are now integral features of public debate and academic analysis of social change in Europe and North America. Yet, on neither side of the Atlantic did the received academic wisdom of the 1950s and 1960s view social movements in a generally favorable light (Jenkins, 1983; Melucci, 1989). In European analyses were dominated by Marxist conceptions of class conflict in which only the workers’ movement truly challenged capitalist injustices, other movements either fragmented the opposition, or were bourgeois and irrelevant to the political agenda of the Left. In the USA, the most hospitable analyses devalued social movements as temporary disequilibria soon to be reintegrated into smoothly functioning social systems. The renaissance of social movement research on both sides of the Atlantic that began during the 1970s represented a concerted effort by a new generation of scholars to understand the emergence, significance, and effects of the movements of the 1960s. In Europe, this emerging cohort of researchers developed new social movement theory, while their North American counterparts formulated resource mobilization (RM) theory (see Jenkins, 1983; McAdam et al., 1988; Edwards and McCarthy, 2004).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.