Valuing Ecosystem Services
Show Less

Valuing Ecosystem Services

Methodological Issues and Case Studies

Edited by K. N. Ninan

Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services is critical to promoting human welfare and sustainable development. Ecosystem services valuation has therefore recently assumed prominence in research and policy circles. In this illuminating volume, leading experts from around the world discuss the key methodological issues and challenges in valuing ecosystem services. Covering a cross-section of ecosystems and services in different sites, countries and regions, the collection also usefully presents case studies that value ecosystem services and experiences with operationalising valuation into policy.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 8: Limited local values and uncertain global risks in ecosystem service conservation: an example from pollinating services

R. David Simpson

Extract

Ostensibly undeveloped or unused land may be valuable to society for the services natural ecosystems preserved on it provide. This observation has motivated a great deal of recent research and policy analysis (see e.g. MA, 2005; TEEB, 2010; and the papers introduced by Kareiva and Ruffo, 2009). There are, however, a plethora of unresolved questions regarding how valuable the services of such ecosystems are and which among the services is most salient. There are also important unresolved questions concerning who will find ecosystem services most valuable. A number of researchers have found that the services of natural ecosystems may be considerably more valuable to global beneficiaries than they are to the specific local communities that make decisions concerning the preservation or destruction of local ecosystems (see e.g. Kremen et al., 2000; Naidoo and Rickets, 2006). This mismatch is problematic, as local people cannot be expected to conserve their natural ecosystems when they are not compensated for the often substantial opportunity costs of doing so. Inasmuch as the international community has not established a very admirable record for ‘putting its money where its mouth is’ in the support of biodiversity and ecosystem services (see e.g. Pearce, 2005), a search continues for ecosystem services that might prove to be of enough value to local communities to motivate conservation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.