Legal Thought and Philosophy
Show Less

Legal Thought and Philosophy

What Legal Scholarship is About

Bert van Roermund

Legal Thought and Philosophy clarifies background questions in legal research projects, such as the relationship between law and justice, law and politics, law and knowledge, facts and norms, normativity and validity, constituent and constitutional power, and rule and context. It provides advanced students in law and philosophy with an account of legal thinking that combines analytical and phenomenological insights.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Justice, rights and human dignity

What Legal Scholarship is About

Bert van Roermund


Having rejected a naturalistic conception of self-preservation, along with its contractual architecture, I may well find myself double-trapped. Am I really saying that in order to pursue self-preservation we have to exercise autonomy, as the term self-determination suggests, and then that in order to exercise autonomy we have to touch base in self-awareness that is calibrated against reality? The first trap would be collapsing autonomy into heteronomy: Is something ‘other-than-me’ going to tell me who I am? We may try to avoid it by shifting to reverse gear and collapsing the meaning of self-awareness into self-determination after all. I shall investigate this hypothesis in what I take to be its strongest form: a model of social life that is radically based upon ultimate self-determination by every first person agent (section 1). Often I will simply use the (italicised) pronoun ‘I’ (and related pronouns) to indicate this perspective. At first sight, this model seems awkward indeed, as it appears to enthrone power in its most absolute and arbitrary form. Indeed, it takes us back to the point where the heptagon suggests proceeding from a contract of association towards a contract of authorisation if we really want to survive as masters of our own lives. But are these contracts inspired by a realistic conceptualisation of how power operates? What if we would learn from Machiavelli (and others) that power is exercised, first and foremost, by strategic self-restraint? Perhaps, generalised self- determination would usher in a relatively stable order in society, instead of producing arbitrariness and chaos?

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.