Chapter 4: Legal and policy responses to climate change
The global warming issue has been visible in the international agenda for some time. Nations spent the early years simply corroborating that climate change was a real and serious issue, without considering the need to be legally bound by international treaties in order to solve the problem. With time, there was a clear agreement within the international community that, unless nations were legally bound, there would be no progress in addressing global warming. In the early 1990s, most countries joined an international treaty – the UNFCCC – to consider what could be done to reduce global warming, and how to cope with inevitable temperature increases. Years later, a number of nations approved an addition to the UNFCCC, i.e., the Kyoto Protocol, which has more powerful (and legally binding) measures, although even that has not succeeded in a sincere and effective multilateral effort towards tackling climate change. In fact, so far, MEAs have not had much success, overall, in terms of global governance. In particular, the Kyoto Protocol has not succeeded in addressing the climate change problem as a common concern. Apart from the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, barely a single case of international law has solved an environmental problem.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.