Chapter 6: Top-down and bottom-up approaches to climate change and trade
This chapter argues that the Kyoto Protocol to the 1992 UNFCCC was doomed to face serious difficulties ab initio because it places the responsibility of reducing GHG emissions only with developed countries (i.e., Annex I countries) as if they were the only countries guilty of causing climate change, when in fact the whole world is collectively responsible for this. If the international community is serious about GHG emissions reduction, a more plausible way to reduce GHG emissions (which is the whole purpose of the exercise) is to involve major GHG emitters, irrespective of their GDP. For that, it would be necessary to amend the UNFCCC in order to get rid of its Annex I, which has proven to be a static approach to climate change mitigation. Amending treaties is a common praxis in other legal regimes. For instance, EU treaties are frequently amended on the basis of societal needs. A good example is the Treaty of Lisbon, which was amended to respond to the Euro crisis. The same could and should be done with the UNFCCC in order to adapt to today’s and tomorrow’s climate change needs.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.