Dialogue, Dissemination and Visions
Edited by Kristian Borch, Sandra Dingli and Michael Søgaard Jørgensen
Chapter 5: Dialogue in foresight: consensus, conflict and negotiation
In the attempt to examine systematically the longer-term future of science, technology, the economy and society, foresight seeks knowledge and tries to identify those tendencies that lead towards aggregation and consensus and those that generate conflict. Experience with public debate indicates that the more controversial the issue is, the greater the necessity for maintaining multi-perspective dialogue between the ‘social actors’. Such debate is often highly normative, reflecting the degree of aversion to risk and uncertainty of the actors involved. However, differences in professional language and culture can make such dialogue difficult. Gibbons (1999) writes: ‘Since expertise now has to bring together knowledge that is itself distributed, contextualized and heterogeneous, it cannot arise at one specific site, or out of the views of one scientific discipline or group of highly respected researchers’. Rather it must emerge from bringing together the many different ‘knowledge dimensions’ involved. Its authority depends on the way in which such a collective group is linked, often in a self-organized way. Breakdowns in social authority arise when links are inadequately established, as it for example has been the case in European debates over genetically modified organisms (Borch et al., 2003).
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.